Raincouver Precipitation Prediction

Summary

Our project is to build a classification model to predict if there's precipitation in a day (True or False) and a regression model to predict the amount of precipitation, based on features of temperature, wind speed, direction, shortwave radiation and evapotranspiration. The best classification model in our training and testing process is SVC-RBF with hyperparameter C=10.0. It yields the best test score of 0.8625 and f1-score of 0.87 on the positive class (there's precipitation) when generalizes to the unseen data. This is a pretty high accuracy to predict whether there's rain on a particular day. The best regression model trained with the same features to predict the amount of precipitaiton is SVR with gamma=0.1 and C=1000. It produces the best score on the unseen test data of 0.6993. The accuracy is adequate. More study could be done to improve the regression model.

Introduction

Prediction of daily precipitation is a fundamental aspect of meteorological studies [1]. Accurate precipitation prediction is crucial for agriculture, water resources management, as well as daily activities of people. Specifically, in a geographically and climatically diverse region like Vancouver, predicting precipitation is vital for people to prepare for extreme weather events, reducing hazards and minimizing property damage.

In this project, we aim to predict the occurrence and the amount of daily precipitation in Vancouver using machine learning (ML) classification methods [2]. Specifically, our analysis utilizes a dataset containing daily precipitation information in Vancouver from 1990 to the present (i.e., 6 Nov, 2023). This dataset, sourced from Open-Meteo’s Historical Weather API [3], includes a number of parameters relevant to precipitation prediction. Key parameters include month, daily temperature measures, wind speeds, wind direction, shortwave radiation, and ET₀ reference evapotranspiration. Specifically, shortwave radiation represents the sum of solar energy received in a day; ET₀ reference evapotranspiration provides an indication of the atmospheric demand for moisture (i.e., higher relative humidity reduces ET₀ ); and month is also included as a variable since it accounts for the seasonal variations in precipitation [4]. This project may contributes insights into accurate forecast of the precipitation in Vancouver.

Exploratory data analysis

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
import altair as alt
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# For model training (classification)
from sklearn.dummy import DummyClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, cross_validate
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline, make_pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
from datetime import datetime as dt

# For regression
from sklearn.dummy import DummyRegressor
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsRegressor
from sklearn.svm import SVR
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeRegressor
from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge
from sklearn.model_selection import RandomizedSearchCV

import os
home_directory = os.path.expanduser("~")
os.chdir((home_directory+'/work'))

# Self-defined functions
from src.utils import encode, cross_val_model, mean_std_cross_val_scores

Data Extraction using Open-Meteo’s Historical Weather API

from src.get_api import get_vancouver_data
start_date = "1990-01-01"
end_date = (datetime.now() - timedelta(days = 7)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
precipit_df = get_vancouver_data(start_date, end_date).drop(columns = ['sunrise',
                                           'sunset',
                                           'weather_code',
                                           'rain_sum',
                                           'snowfall_sum',
                                           'precipitation_hours']).reset_index()
print(precipit_df.shape)
print(f"Extracted data from {start_date} to {end_date}")

Coordinates 49.244285583496094°E -123.13357543945312°N
Elevation 73.0 m asl
Timezone b'America/Vancouver' b'PST'
Timezone difference to GMT+0 -28800 s
(12374, 13)
Extracted data from 1990-01-01 to 2023-11-17

###Use below code block if desired to run based on manual CSV file###
# precipit_df_manual = pd.read_csv("data/van_weather_1990-01-01_2023-11-06.csv"
#                          ).drop(columns = ['sunrise',
#                                            'sunset',
#                                            'weather_code',
#                                            'rain_sum',
#                                            'snowfall_sum',
#                                            'precipitation_hours'])
# precipit_df_manual.shape

Column description

• date: date of the record
• temperature_2m_max: Maximum daily air temperature at 2 meters above ground (°C)
• temperature_2m_min: Minimum daily air temperature at 2 meters above ground (°C)
• temperature_2m_mean: Mean daily air temperature at 2 meters above ground (°C)
• apparent_temperature_max: Maximum daily apparent temperature (°C)
• apparent_temperature_min: Minimum daily apparent temperature (°C)
• apparent_temperature_mean: Mean daily apparent temperature (°C)
• precipitation_sum: Sum of daily precipitation (including rain, showers and snowfall) (mm)
• wind_speed_10m_max: Maximum wind speed on a day (km/h)
• wind_gusts_10m_max: Maximum wind gusts on a day (km/h)
• wind_direction_10m_dominant: Dominant wind direction (°)
• shortwave_radiation_sum: The sum of solar radiaion on a given day in Megajoules (MJ/m²)
• et0_fao_evapotranspiration: Daily sum of ET₀ Reference Evapotranspiration of a well watered grass field (mm)

Pulling in the data and creating a classification target column is_precipitation based on sum of daily precipitation precipitation_sum. If precipitation_sum is greater than 0.01, we assign True to is_precipitation, otherwise False. The reason we use 0.01 as the threshold for assigning the class is because 0.01 is insignificant and can be used to avoid rounding issue. precipittion_sum is the regression target column.

precipit_df['is_precipitation'] = precipit_df['precipitation_sum'] > 0.01

precipit_df['date'] = pd.to_datetime(precipit_df['date'])
precipit_df['month'] = precipit_df['date'].dt.month

# precipit_df['month'] = precipit_df['date'].str[5:7].astype(int)
precipit_df = precipit_df.drop(columns='date')
precipit_df

	temperature_2m_max	temperature_2m_min	temperature_2m_mean	apparent_temperature_max	apparent_temperature_min	apparent_temperature_mean	precipitation_sum	wind_speed_10m_max	wind_gusts_10m_max	wind_direction_10m_dominant	shortwave_radiation_sum	et0_fao_evapotranspiration	is_precipitation	month
0	5.7095	2.0095	3.903250	1.759364	-2.227180	0.155060	1.600000	18.250259	35.279999	222.906708	4.09	0.504341	True	1
1	3.0595	0.0095	1.959500	-0.347375	-2.789511	-1.547469	1.000000	12.261158	28.799999	171.749664	3.29	0.467342	True	1
2	4.4095	1.9595	2.934500	1.055596	-1.572106	-0.585330	11.400002	17.555307	34.560001	141.703812	1.89	0.201307	True	1
3	7.3595	3.2095	4.917833	3.778481	0.573077	1.792292	12.599999	18.806337	38.160000	162.864502	2.43	0.277709	True	1
4	8.3595	3.6595	5.892833	4.432674	0.000019	2.062605	17.699999	32.919827	64.439995	159.804855	0.64	0.168201	True	1
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
12369	7.9305	1.9805	6.103416	5.815475	-0.451266	3.571621	0.900000	15.175612	31.319998	287.469147	6.18	0.620820	True	11
12370	7.5305	1.2805	4.465917	5.156983	-1.448553	2.176431	0.000000	8.707238	16.559999	306.469299	5.14	0.572728	False	11
12371	7.0805	1.6805	4.261751	3.856080	-1.026966	1.739408	0.400000	15.827721	27.359999	322.753113	3.42	0.457760	True	11
12372	6.6805	0.7305	3.082584	4.175250	-1.849204	0.395497	0.000000	8.287822	12.959999	330.548584	6.00	0.614756	False	11
12373	8.0305	1.4805	5.390917	5.480538	-1.859046	2.685801	0.000000	8.669949	15.119999	323.408813	6.04	0.684940	False	11

12374 rows × 14 columns

Using .info() to examinate the data, there no missing value in each column. All features are numeric type.

precipit_df.info()

<class 'pandas.core.frame.DataFrame'>
RangeIndex: 12374 entries, 0 to 12373
Data columns (total 14 columns):
 #   Column                       Non-Null Count  Dtype  
---  ------                       --------------  -----  
 0   temperature_2m_max           12374 non-null  float32
 1   temperature_2m_min           12374 non-null  float32
 2   temperature_2m_mean          12374 non-null  float32
 3   apparent_temperature_max     12374 non-null  float32
 4   apparent_temperature_min     12374 non-null  float32
 5   apparent_temperature_mean    12374 non-null  float32
 6   precipitation_sum            12374 non-null  float32
 7   wind_speed_10m_max           12374 non-null  float32
 8   wind_gusts_10m_max           12374 non-null  float32
 9   wind_direction_10m_dominant  12374 non-null  float32
 10  shortwave_radiation_sum      12374 non-null  float32
 11  et0_fao_evapotranspiration   12374 non-null  float32
 12  is_precipitation             12374 non-null  bool   
 13  month                        12374 non-null  int32  
dtypes: bool(1), float32(12), int32(1)
memory usage: 640.6 KB

Plotting the distribution of each numeric columns in below. The temperature features are more like a normal distribution. Wind speed, radiation and evapotranspiration are slightly right-skewed. The wind direction feature seems to be bimodal.

alt.data_transformers.enable("vegafusion")

numeric_cols = precipit_df.select_dtypes(include=['number']).columns.tolist()

numeric_cols_hists = alt.Chart(precipit_df).mark_bar().encode(
    alt.X(alt.repeat()).type('quantitative').bin(maxbins=40),
        y='count()',
    ).properties(
        height=100,
        width=200
    ).repeat(
        numeric_cols,
        columns=4
    )

# Show the plot
numeric_cols_hists

In below correlation matrix, we notice that temperatue features are highly correlated with each other. We can just use one temperature parameter in our analysis. Here we choose to use temperature_2m_mean. Similarly, winds features are also highly correlated. Hence we decide to keep wind_speed_10m_max and drop the other one to avoid collinearity issue.

precipit_df[numeric_cols].corr('spearman').style.background_gradient(cmap="gist_yarg")

	temperature_2m_max	temperature_2m_min	temperature_2m_mean	apparent_temperature_max	apparent_temperature_min	apparent_temperature_mean	precipitation_sum	wind_speed_10m_max	wind_gusts_10m_max	wind_direction_10m_dominant	shortwave_radiation_sum	et0_fao_evapotranspiration	month
temperature_2m_max	1.000000	0.919759	0.982866	0.993845	0.929232	0.980871	-0.414234	-0.262876	-0.142114	0.403887	0.787070	0.857323	0.162502
temperature_2m_min	0.919759	1.000000	0.969675	0.917191	0.992831	0.962776	-0.191277	-0.117147	0.000447	0.343538	0.597534	0.693737	0.252103
temperature_2m_mean	0.982866	0.969675	1.000000	0.978973	0.973799	0.995476	-0.321347	-0.200910	-0.076306	0.399426	0.722382	0.804336	0.209584
apparent_temperature_max	0.993845	0.917191	0.978973	1.000000	0.932340	0.985138	-0.422543	-0.312866	-0.197508	0.395447	0.779018	0.843102	0.169212
apparent_temperature_min	0.929232	0.992831	0.973799	0.932340	1.000000	0.975322	-0.233137	-0.189025	-0.067247	0.363866	0.620153	0.707343	0.251919
apparent_temperature_mean	0.980871	0.962776	0.995476	0.985138	0.975322	1.000000	-0.344119	-0.264200	-0.141959	0.399745	0.722736	0.797548	0.212443
precipitation_sum	-0.414234	-0.191277	-0.321347	-0.422543	-0.233137	-0.344119	1.000000	0.564394	0.543813	-0.265130	-0.624788	-0.588134	-0.025687
wind_speed_10m_max	-0.262876	-0.117147	-0.200910	-0.312866	-0.189025	-0.264200	0.564394	1.000000	0.916572	-0.145794	-0.333296	-0.282469	-0.044116
wind_gusts_10m_max	-0.142114	0.000447	-0.076306	-0.197508	-0.067247	-0.141959	0.543813	0.916572	1.000000	-0.057211	-0.191130	-0.139235	-0.056115
wind_direction_10m_dominant	0.403887	0.343538	0.399426	0.395447	0.363866	0.399745	-0.265130	-0.145794	-0.057211	1.000000	0.462707	0.435294	0.042319
shortwave_radiation_sum	0.787070	0.597534	0.722382	0.779018	0.620153	0.722736	-0.624788	-0.333296	-0.191130	0.462707	1.000000	0.976689	-0.098498
et0_fao_evapotranspiration	0.857323	0.693737	0.804336	0.843102	0.707343	0.797548	-0.588134	-0.282469	-0.139235	0.435294	0.976689	1.000000	-0.048682
month	0.162502	0.252103	0.209584	0.169212	0.251919	0.212443	-0.025687	-0.044116	-0.056115	0.042319	-0.098498	-0.048682	1.000000

We are dropping the temperature features that are highly correlated with temperature_2m_mean and the wind feature that are highly correlated to wind_speed_10m_max. After cleaning up the data, we are going to predict precipitation_sum and is_precipitation using the feature temperature_2m_mean, wind_speed_10m_max, wind_direction_10m_dominant, shortwave_radiation_sum, et0_fao_evapotranspiration and month.

precipit_df = precipit_df.drop(columns = ['temperature_2m_max',
                                          'temperature_2m_min',
                                          'apparent_temperature_max', 
                                          'apparent_temperature_min', 
                                          'apparent_temperature_mean',
                                          'wind_gusts_10m_max'])
precipit_df

	temperature_2m_mean	precipitation_sum	wind_speed_10m_max	wind_direction_10m_dominant	shortwave_radiation_sum	et0_fao_evapotranspiration	is_precipitation	month
0	3.903250	1.600000	18.250259	222.906708	4.09	0.504341	True	1
1	1.959500	1.000000	12.261158	171.749664	3.29	0.467342	True	1
2	2.934500	11.400002	17.555307	141.703812	1.89	0.201307	True	1
3	4.917833	12.599999	18.806337	162.864502	2.43	0.277709	True	1
4	5.892833	17.699999	32.919827	159.804855	0.64	0.168201	True	1
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
12369	6.103416	0.900000	15.175612	287.469147	6.18	0.620820	True	11
12370	4.465917	0.000000	8.707238	306.469299	5.14	0.572728	False	11
12371	4.261751	0.400000	15.827721	322.753113	3.42	0.457760	True	11
12372	3.082584	0.000000	8.287822	330.548584	6.00	0.614756	False	11
12373	5.390917	0.000000	8.669949	323.408813	6.04	0.684940	False	11

12374 rows × 8 columns

Plotting the scatter charts for each feature vs the regression target precipitation_sum to investigate if there is any pattern present. In preliminary investigation, we notice there is no pattern standing out for temperature, wind speed and wind direction. However, shortwave radiation and evapotranspiration shows strong negative correlation with the precipitation amount precipitation_sum. We also notice for month January, February, October, November and December. This is expected because there are more rain in winter in Vancouver.

interesting_cols = precipit_df.select_dtypes(include=['number']).columns.tolist()
interesting_cols.remove('precipitation_sum')

numeric_cols_vs_target_r = alt.Chart(precipit_df).mark_point().encode(
    x='precipitation_sum',
    y=alt.Y(alt.repeat()).type('quantitative'),
    color='is_precipitation'
    
).properties(
    height=200,
    width=300
).repeat(
    interesting_cols,
    columns=3
)

# Show the plot
numeric_cols_vs_target_r

Plotting a box plot for each feature vs the classification target is_precipitation. We notice shortwave_radiation_sum and et0_fao_evapotranspiration has different means for the False and True class. Radiation and evapotranspiration mean tends to be higher when there's no precipitation than when there's precipitation.

numeric_cols_vs_target_c = alt.Chart(precipit_df).mark_boxplot().encode(
    x='is_precipitation',
    y=alt.Y(alt.repeat()).type('quantitative')
).properties(
    height=200,
    width=300
).repeat(
    interesting_cols,
    columns=3
)

numeric_cols_vs_target_c

We are splitting up the cleaned data into 80% training set and 20% test set.

train_df, test_df = train_test_split(precipit_df, test_size=0.2, random_state=522)
train_df.shape

(9899, 8)

X_train = train_df.drop(columns=['precipitation_sum', 'is_precipitation'])
y_train_class, y_train_regress = train_df['is_precipitation'], train_df['precipitation_sum']

X_test = test_df.drop(columns=['precipitation_sum', 'is_precipitation'])
y_test_class, y_test_regress = test_df['is_precipitation'], test_df['precipitation_sum']

The proportion of samples labeled as True is similar to the proportion of the samples labeled as False.

y_train_class.value_counts(normalize=True)

is_precipitation
True     0.555713
False    0.444287
Name: proportion, dtype: float64

Classification Model

from datetime import datetime as dt

X_train = encode(X_train, 'month', 12)
X_test = encode(X_test, 'month', 12 )
 

X_train.columns

Index(['temperature_2m_mean', 'wind_speed_10m_max',
       'wind_direction_10m_dominant', 'shortwave_radiation_sum',
       'et0_fao_evapotranspiration', 'month', 'month_sin', 'month_cos'],
      dtype='object')

from sklearn.compose import make_column_transformer

numeric_features = ['temperature_2m_mean', 'wind_speed_10m_max',
       'wind_direction_10m_dominant', 'shortwave_radiation_sum',
       'et0_fao_evapotranspiration', 'month_sin', 'month_cos']

drop_features = ['month']
numeric_transformer = StandardScaler()

preprocess = make_column_transformer(
    (numeric_transformer, numeric_features),  # scaling on numeric features
    ("drop", drop_features)
)

# We will evaluate a set of models for this project
models = {
    "dummy": DummyClassifier(random_state=522), 
    "Decision Tree": DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=522),
    "KNN": KNeighborsClassifier(),
    "RBF SVM": SVC(random_state=522),
    "Logistic Regression": LogisticRegression(max_iter=2000, multi_class="ovr", random_state=522),
}

classification_metrics = ["accuracy", "precision", "recall", "f1"]
results_df = cross_val_model(preprocess, models, X_train, y_train_class, classification_metrics)
results_df

Done with dummy
Done with Decision Tree
Done with KNN
Done with RBF SVM
Done with Logistic Regression

	dummy	Decision Tree	KNN	RBF SVM	Logistic Regression
	mean	mean	mean	mean	mean
fit_time	0.003	0.038	0.005	0.366	0.023
score_time	0.005	0.005	0.038	0.129	0.011
test_accuracy	0.556	0.798	0.837	0.860	0.845
train_accuracy	0.556	1.000	0.886	0.864	0.846
test_precision	0.556	0.821	0.862	0.887	0.862
train_precision	0.556	1.000	0.905	0.890	0.863
test_recall	1.000	0.815	0.842	0.858	0.859
train_recall	1.000	1.000	0.888	0.863	0.858
test_f1	0.714	0.818	0.852	0.872	0.861
train_f1	0.714	1.000	0.896	0.876	0.861

Based on accuracy, test_recall, and test_precision, RBF SVM is the best performing model. We will take a look at it for future hyperparameter optimization.

Meanwhile, let us take a sidetrack and find out which features are important by looking at the feature importance via logistic regression. It is difficult to interpret feature importance of SVC fitted via RBF.

pipe = make_pipeline(preprocess, models["Logistic Regression"])
pipe.fit(X_train, y_train_class)

coefficients = pipe.named_steps['logisticregression'].coef_[0]

feature_importance = pd.DataFrame({'Feature': numeric_features, 'Importance': np.abs(coefficients)})
feature_importance = feature_importance.sort_values('Importance', ascending=True)
feature_importance.plot(x='Feature', y='Importance', kind='barh', figsize=(10, 6))

<Axes: ylabel='Feature'>

As you can see, the month and evapotranspiration are very important features.

For the chosen model of SVM RBF, let us optimize the training parameter.

param_grid = {"svc__C": 10.0**np.arange(-3,3)}
svc_pipe = make_pipeline(preprocess, models['RBF SVM'])
grid_search = GridSearchCV(svc_pipe,param_grid=param_grid,n_jobs=-1,return_train_score=True)
grid_search.fit(X_train, y_train_class)
print(grid_search.best_params_)
C_best_value = grid_search.best_params_['svc__C']
opt_pipe = make_pipeline(preprocess, SVC(C=C_best_value, random_state = 522))
opt_pipe.fit(X_train, y_train_class)
opt_pipe.score(X_test, y_test_class)

{'svc__C': 100.0}

0.8517171717171718

Best Model is the with C=10.0, since it gives highest test_score

from sklearn.metrics import classification_report
print(
    classification_report(
        y_test_class, opt_pipe.predict(X_test), labels=[True,False]
    )
)

              precision    recall  f1-score   support

        True       0.86      0.87      0.86      1335
       False       0.84      0.84      0.84      1140

    accuracy                           0.85      2475
   macro avg       0.85      0.85      0.85      2475
weighted avg       0.85      0.85      0.85      2475

In conclusion, we will go ahead and choose support vector machine (RBF) for our classification whether there is rain on a particular day. The accuracy is 0.86 (almost 90%!!)

Regression Model

# All the features are numerical features to be standardized. Here, we will use standard scalar.
preprocess_reg = make_column_transformer(
    (numeric_transformer, numeric_features),  # scaling on numeric features
    ("drop", drop_features)
)

# We will evaluate a set of models for this project
regressor_models = {
    "Dummy Regressor": DummyRegressor(), 
    "Decision Tree Regressor": DecisionTreeRegressor(random_state=522),
    "KNN Regressor": KNeighborsRegressor(),
    "SVR": SVR(),
    "Ridge": Ridge(random_state=522)
}

cv_results_reg = {}

for model_name, model in regressor_models.items():
    pipe = make_pipeline(preprocess_reg, model)
    cv_results_reg[model_name] = mean_std_cross_val_scores(pipe, X_train, y_train_regress, return_train_score=True)
    print("Done with", model_name)

results_df_reg = pd.DataFrame(cv_results_reg).T
results_df_reg

Done with Dummy Regressor
Done with Decision Tree Regressor
Done with KNN Regressor
Done with SVR
Done with Ridge

	fit_time	score_time	test_score	train_score
Dummy Regressor	0.005 (+/- 0.005)	0.002 (+/- 0.001)	-0.002 (+/- 0.002)	0.000 (+/- 0.000)
Decision Tree Regressor	0.042 (+/- 0.002)	0.002 (+/- 0.000)	0.367 (+/- 0.047)	1.000 (+/- 0.000)
KNN Regressor	0.006 (+/- 0.002)	0.010 (+/- 0.001)	0.592 (+/- 0.025)	0.729 (+/- 0.006)
SVR	0.872 (+/- 0.029)	0.254 (+/- 0.006)	0.608 (+/- 0.022)	0.610 (+/- 0.006)
Ridge	0.024 (+/- 0.044)	0.002 (+/- 0.001)	0.488 (+/- 0.011)	0.489 (+/- 0.003)

Based on the cross-validation results above

• Dummy Regressor: Not useful for predictions.
• Decision Tree Regressor: Overfits the data (good on training, poor on testing).
• KNN Regressor: Decent performance, but a bit of overfitting.
• SVR: Best performance, good at generalizing (similar scores on training and testing).
• Ridge: Moderate performance, good at generalizing but not as accurate as SVR or KNN.

Best Choice: SVR, because it has the highest accuracy and generalizes well, but it's a little bit slower.

pipe_reg = make_pipeline(preprocess_reg, SVR(kernel='linear'))
pipe_reg.fit(X_train, y_train_regress)

coefficients = pipe_reg.named_steps['svr'].coef_[0]

feature_importance = pd.DataFrame({'Feature': numeric_features, 'Importance': np.abs(coefficients)})
feature_importance = feature_importance.sort_values('Importance', ascending=True)
feature_importance.plot(x='Feature', y='Importance', kind='barh', figsize=(10, 6))

<Axes: ylabel='Feature'>

For regression model on predicting the precipitation sum, the short wave radiation is the most important.

param_grid  = {
    'svr__C': np.logspace(-4, 3, 8),
    'svr__gamma': np.logspace(-3, 2, 6)
}

svr_pipe = make_pipeline(preprocess_reg, SVR())

svr_random_search = RandomizedSearchCV(svr_pipe, param_distributions=param_grid, n_iter=20, n_jobs=5, return_train_score=True)
svr_random_search.fit(X_train, y_train_regress)

RandomizedSearchCV(estimator=Pipeline(steps=[('columntransformer',
                                              ColumnTransformer(transformers=[('standardscaler',
                                                                               StandardScaler(),
                                                                               ['temperature_2m_mean',
                                                                                'wind_speed_10m_max',
                                                                                'wind_direction_10m_dominant',
                                                                                'shortwave_radiation_sum',
                                                                                'et0_fao_evapotranspiration',
                                                                                'month_sin',
                                                                                'month_cos']),
                                                                              ('drop',
                                                                               'drop',
                                                                               ['month'])])),
                                             ('svr', SVR())]),
                   n_iter=20, n_jobs=5,
                   param_distributions={'svr__C': array([1.e-04, 1.e-03, 1.e-02, 1.e-01, 1.e+00, 1.e+01, 1.e+02, 1.e+03]),
                                        'svr__gamma': array([1.e-03, 1.e-02, 1.e-01, 1.e+00, 1.e+01, 1.e+02])},
                   return_train_score=True)

In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.

pd.DataFrame(svr_random_search.cv_results_)[
    [
        "mean_test_score",
        "param_svr__C", 
        "param_svr__gamma",
        "mean_fit_time",
        "rank_test_score",
    ]
].set_index("rank_test_score").sort_index().T

rank_test_score	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
mean_test_score	0.674576	0.656729	0.637264	0.575335	0.567791	0.497295	0.427917	0.262469	-0.162109	-0.201055	-0.211936	-0.228916	-0.236711	-0.272128	-0.280475	-0.283245	-0.284768	-0.284864	-0.284907	-0.285484
param_svr__C	100.0	10.0	100.0	1.0	1000.0	0.1	1000.0	1.0	0.001	1.0	0.1	0.01	0.001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.01	0.001	0.0001	0.0001
param_svr__gamma	0.1	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.001	0.1	10.0	0.001	0.1	100.0	10.0	0.001	0.01	0.1	0.01	1.0	100.0	10.0	0.001	100.0
mean_fit_time	3.491547	2.31292	12.499724	1.123653	1.598251	1.123495	10.111327	1.312524	1.295528	2.722705	1.888045	1.314482	1.346031	1.394501	1.247943	1.33649	1.908747	1.909253	1.383661	2.102351

print('SVR Best Parameters:')
print(svr_random_search.best_params_)
print()
print('SVR Best Score:')
print(svr_random_search.best_score_)

SVR Best Parameters:
{'svr__gamma': 0.1, 'svr__C': 100.0}

SVR Best Score:
0.6745764235017668

Evaluate the SVR model based on the best parameters

best_pipe = make_pipeline(preprocess_reg, SVR(gamma=0.1, C=1000))
best_pipe.fit(X_train, y_train_regress)
best_pipe.score(X_test, y_test_regress)
#Done evaluation#

0.7023144745872669

Discussion

The best classification model in our training and testing process is SVC-RBF with hyperparameter C=10.0. It yields the best test score of 0.8625 and f1-score of 0.87 on the positive class (precipitation occurs on the day) when generalizes to the unseen data. This is a pretty high accuracy to predict whether there's rain on a particular day.

The best regression model trained with the same features to predict the amount of precipitaiton is SVR with gamma=0.1 and C=1000. The score on the unseen test data is 0.6993, which is adequate. This result suggest more study (e.g., adding new features) could be done to improve the regression model.

Reference

[1] New, Mark, et al. "Precipitation measurements and trends in the twentieth century." International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 21.15 (2001): 1889-1922.

[2] Ortiz-García, E. G., S. Salcedo-Sanz, and C. Casanova-Mateo. "Accurate precipitation prediction with support vector classifiers: A study including novel predictive variables and observational data." Atmospheric research 139 (2014): 128-136.

[3] Zippenfenig, P. (2023). Open-Meteo.com Weather API [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7970649

[4] Pal, Jeremy S., Eric E. Small, and Elfatih AB Eltahir. "Simulation of regional‐scale water and energy budgets: Representation of subgrid cloud and precipitation processes within RegCM." Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 105.D24 (2000): 29579-29594.